ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Neuropsychology Strengths-Based Approach for the Assessment of Autism in Adults: Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Clients' Experiences of the Diagnosis and Feedback Process.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigate the utility of a neuropsychological strengths-based approach to the assessment of Autism in adults; to determine the acceptability of the approach and feedback provided to clients; and gather information about improving the assessment process for future clients. The approach was grounded in a neurodiversity-positive framework, providing diagnosis-affirming care. Participants were inpatient clients of the neuropsychology service of a private adult, mental health treatment service. A structured, qualitative, interview framework and thematic analysis was employed, with questions focused on clients' experience of the assessment process, recommendations for improvements and utility of the feedback provided. Ten adult clients with Autism participated (83% participation rate). All participants described having a positive experience with the assessment, from the information pre-assessment, to the assessment tasks, and the clinicians' approach. Several hampering or challenging factors were also reported, including sensory challenges and mental fatigue. Most found the feedback process a positive experience. Suggestions for improving the feedback included simplification and individualisation of the information provided, and ensuring access to multiple and extended feedback sessions. Some clients conceptualised the assessment as part of their Autism identification journey and some found the concept of neurodiversity helpful. Strengths-based neuropsychology assessments, grounded in a neurodiversity-positive framework, were acceptable for adult inpatient participants recently diagnosed with Autism. All reported positive sentiments about the assessment, in addition to helpful adjustments to improve the process. Gaps were identified in opportunities to access Autism specific support following diagnosis. A number of recommendations are provided to assist neuropsychologists conducting Autism assessments for adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40931248What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.