ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Implementing a Resource-Light and Low-Code Large Language Model System for Information Extraction from Mammography Reports: A Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Reply to Sengul I and Sengul D.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- A CDE-based data structure for radiotherapeutic decision-making in breast cancer.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have been successfully used for data extraction from free-text radiology reports. Most current studies were conducted with LLMs accessed via an application programming interface (API). We evaluated the feasibility of using open-source LLMs, deployed on limited local hardware resources for data extraction from free-text mammography reports, using a common data element (CDE)-based structure. Seventy-nine CDEs were defined by an interdisciplinary expert panel, reflecting real-world reporting practice. Sixty-one reports were classified by two independent researchers to establish ground truth. Five different open-source LLMs deployable on a single GPU were used for data extraction using the general-classifier Python package. Extractions were performed for five different prompt approaches with calculation of overall accuracy, micro-recall and micro-F1. Additional analyses were conducted using thresholds for the relative probability of classifications. High inter-rater agreement was observed between manual classifiers (Cohen's kappa 0.83). Using default prompts, the LLMs achieved accuracies of 59.2-72.9%. Chain-of-thought prompting yielded mixed results, while few-shot prompting led to decreased accuracy. Adaptation of the default prompts to precisely define classification tasks improved performance for all models, with accuracies of 64.7-85.3%. Setting certainty thresholds further improved accuracies to > 90% but reduced the coverage rate to < 50%. Locally deployed open-source LLMs can effectively extract information from mammography reports, maintaining compatibility with limited computational resources. Selection and evaluation of the model and prompting strategy are critical. Clear, task-specific instructions appear crucial for high performance. Using a CDE-based framework provides clear semantics and structure for the data extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.