ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Deep-Learning System for Automatic Measurement of the Femorotibial Rotational Angle on Lower-Extremity Computed Tomography.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop and validate a deep-learning-based algorithm for automatic identification of anatomical landmarks and calculating femoral and tibial version angles (FTT angles) on lower-extremity CT scans. In this IRB-approved, retrospective study, lower-extremity CT scans from 270 adult patients (median age, 69 years; female to male ratio, 235:35) were analyzed. CT data were preprocessed using contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization and RGB superposition to enhance tissue boundary distinction. The Attention U-Net model was trained using the gold standard of manual labeling and landmark drawing, enabling it to segment bones, detect landmarks, create lines, and automatically measure the femoral version and tibial torsion angles. The model's performance was validated against manual segmentations by a musculoskeletal radiologist using a test dataset. The segmentation model demonstrated 92.16%±0.02 sensitivity, 99.96%±<0.01 specificity, and 2.14±2.39 HD95, with a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 93.12%±0.01. Automatic measurements of femoral and tibial torsion angles showed good correlation with radiologists' measurements, with correlation coefficients of 0.64 for femoral and 0.54 for tibial angles (p < 0.05). Automated segmentation significantly reduced the measurement time per leg compared to manual methods (57.5 ± 8.3 s vs. 79.6 ± 15.9 s, p < 0.05). We developed a method to automate the measurement of femorotibial rotation in continuous axial CT scans of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) using a deep-learning approach. This method has the potential to expedite the analysis of patient data in busy clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.