ArticleJournal of religion and health2025
Investigation of Religious Coping and Psychological Resilience Levels of Women Survivors of the Earthquake Living in a Temporary Shelter in a Turkish Sample.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study was conducted to investigate the religious coping and psychological resilience levels of women survivors of the earthquake living in temporary shelters after the devastating earthquakes that struck southern and eastern Turkey in 2023. In this cross-sectional study conducted between July 24, 2024, and September 24, 2024, 386 women living in a temporary shelter in a province in the eastern part of Turkey were included. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form, Religious Coping Scale, and Brief Resilience Scale. In the analysis of the data, descriptive statistics, independent samples t test, Mann-Whitney U test, ANOVA test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Pearson correlation test were used. The findings indicated that statistically significant differences were determined between the scores the participating women obtained from the overall Positive Religious Coping Subscale of the Religious Coping Scale in terms of the variables such as age, education level, marital status, perceived income level, having living children, presence of a chronic disease, their views on the disaster they were struck by, and their perspectives on the future after the earthquake (p < .05). Statistically significant differences were determined between the scores the participating women obtained from the overall Brief Resilience Scale in terms of the variables such as post-earthquake changes in their sleep pattern and future perspectives (p < .05). There was a statistically significant weak negative relationship between the mean scores the participating women obtained from the Negative Religious Coping subscale of the Religious Coping Scale and the mean scores they obtained from the Brief Resilience Scale (p < .05). The participating women's psychological resilience levels decreased as their negative religious coping levels increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40931237What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.