Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931233›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

The Practical Value of Bayesian Inference in Describing the Epidemiology of Sports Injuries.

Avinash Chandran, Ben Clarsen, Ian Varley, Karim Khan, Stephen W Marshall, Roald Bahr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Avinash ChandranDatalys Center for Sports Injury Research and Prevention, Indianapolis, IN, USA. avinashc@datalyscenter.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-3668
Ben ClarsenFIFA Medical, Fédération Internationale de Football Association, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ian VarleySchool of Science & Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Karim KhanDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Stephen W MarshallDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Roald BahrAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sports injury surveillance programs have been vital in advancing the understanding of injury epidemiology across various athlete populations. Surveillance-based epidemiological measures of injury occurrence are ubiquitous in the sports medicine literature, and the injury rate is one such commonly used measure. Traditional approaches to calculating injury rates have predominantly relied on frequentist methods, which, while informative, have limitations in addressing certain practical questions. We explore an alternative Bayesian framework for analyzing injury rates, highlighting its potential to enhance sports medicine practice. We delineate the practical implications of adopting a Bayesian approach, contrasting key analytical outputs such as credible intervals with their frequentist counterparts. Through simulated and real-world examples, we demonstrate the types of analyses and inferences that are only possible within this framework. We particularly discuss how Bayesian methods allow for direct calculation of probabilities for specific outcomes and provide intuitive interpretations of uncertainty. We discuss the computational and inferential advantages of the Bayesian approach, illustrating how it can offer more nuanced insights into injury incidence in sport injury epidemiology.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesBayes TheoremHumansIncidenceSports Medicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.