ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025
Sustainable and healthy diet index (SHDI) unveils regional differences in Europe and Northern Africa: findings from the SysOrg study.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adherence to healthy and sustainable diets and health-related behaviors in a Spanish online university setting.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe developed a diet quality index based on the Planetary Health Diet (PHD) to assess healthy and sustainable diets. The index was applied alongside socio-demographic characteristics in five regions across Europe and North Africa.
methodsThe Sustainable Healthy Diet Index (SHDI) was designed using existing and validated healthy diet indexes. A total of 2,210 respondents from five case study territories (CST)-Cilento (Italy), Copenhagen (Denmark), North Hessia (Germany), Kenitra (Morocco) and Warsaw (Poland)-completed a food-group frequency questionnaire. Reported consumption frequencies for 24 food groups were converted to grams to assess compliance with PHD recommendations. A higher SHDI score indicates a more sustainable and healthier diet, although the environmental and health impacts are not directly assessed but are estimated based on intake at the food group level.
resultsCopenhagen and Warsaw showed the highest SHDI scores, indicating better adherence to the PHD. In North Hessia, males had significantly better diet quality than females (p < 0.001). In Poland, female respondents with higher income and education had significantly better diet quality (p < 0.05). Compared to national studies, some food group intakes were unexpected, for example, high legume consumption in Copenhagen and high meat intake in Kenitra. Despite the Mediterranean diet being typical for Cilento, vegetable intake there was low.
conclusionSome regions, such as Copenhagen, Kenitra, and Cilento, show beneficial eating patterns, particularly high legume intake. However, meat remains overconsumed in most CSTs. Our study highlights the need for further research to promote cultural acceptance of healthier and more sustainable dietary habits, such as increasing vegetable consumption and reducing meat intake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.