SynthesisJournal of neurology2025
Autoimmune encephalitis with Anti-mGluR1 antibodies: a comprehensive review.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Phenotypes and Prognosis of Anti-mGluR1 Encephalitis: A Single-Center Case Series and Comprehensive Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Seizures in a cat with metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) antibodies: a case report.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Neuroimmune mechanisms of the cerebellum-brainstem network in autoimmune encephalitis and related neuroimmune disorders: antibody targets, selective vulnerability, and translational opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Case Report: A case of anti-mGluR1 antibody-associated encephalitis treated with efgartigimod combined with rituximab.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anti-mGluR1 encephalitis is a rare autoimmune disorder manifesting with cerebellar syndrome with varying levels of severity. However, limited data exist regarding the clinical features and treatment strategies for patients suffering from encephalitis associated with anti-mGluR1 antibodies. Herein, we comprehensively review and discuss clinical features of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis to enhance our understanding of this rare disorder. Our protocol was developed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and is registered with the PROSPERO (identification: RD420251101607). To identify potentially relevant literature, we conducted a thorough search of the following bibliographic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The search strategy yielded 402 articles, of which 23 met the inclusion criteria for our systematic review. These 23 articles, comprising 3 case series and 20 case reports, described 44 patients with anti-mGluR1 encephalitis. We independently extracted data on the following variables: publication, year, location, age, gender, associated malignancies, prodromal symptoms, clinical manifestations on the initial presentation, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing, treatment, duration of last follow-up, and clinical outcome. From the current systematic review, cerebellar ataxia serves as the most prominent clinical manifestation in patients with anti-mGluR1 encephalitis. Furthermore, the proportion of patients receiving first-line immunotherapy was greater in the favorable prognosis group compared to the poor prognosis group. We underscore the importance of early immunotherapy to prevent irreversible cerebellar damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.