Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931202›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2025

The effect of different obturation techniques on post-obturation pain and sealer extrusion in single-visit root canal treatment: a prospective clinical randomized study.

Hisham Mahmoud Hamdy Abada, Mohamed Abd El Rahman El Shreif, Faten Mohamed Ahmed Ghonimy, Ebtesam Osama Abo El-Mal, Dana Saeed Abd Elmonem El Gemaie

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hisham Mahmoud Hamdy AbadaDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt. Hisham.dentist@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7692-3587
Mohamed Abd El Rahman El ShreifDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9210-8809
Faten Mohamed Ahmed GhonimyDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences- Endodontic Division, Faculty of Dentistry, Ahram Canadian University, Giza, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4094-6485
Ebtesam Osama Abo El-MalDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences- Endodontic Division, Faculty of Dentistry, Ahram Canadian University, Giza, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8084-7479
Dana Saeed Abd Elmonem El GemaieDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Galala University, Suez, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7181-6599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPostoperative pain remains a significant concern in endodontics. The main aim of this clinical trial was to assess the impact of various obturation technique and sealer types on post-obturation pain and sealer extrusion in single-visit nonsurgical root canal treatments. MATERIALS AND

methodsStudy participants were recruited through consecutive sampling from patients referred to the Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Institution University, diagnosed as asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The study was conducted on 150 cases that were equally and randomly allocated to each of the studied groups (30 for each group) as following; Group 1 - cold lateral compaction with CeraSeal (CLC-CS); Group 2 - continuous wave compaction with CeraSeal (CWC-CS); Group 3 - single cone technique with CeraSeal (SC-CS); Group 4 - Cold lateral compaction with AH Plus (CLC-AH); and Group 5 - continuous wave compaction with AH Plus (CWC-AH). All endodontic procedures were performed by a single experienced endodontist to standardize treatment protocols. The main outcomes were the post-obturation pain which was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) scale (0-10), and the incidence of sealer extrusion among the studied groups.

resultsAt 6, 24, and 72 h the postobturation pain score did not differ significantly between all studied groups. After 12 and 48 h CWC-CS and CLC-CS showed the lowest significant postobturation pain score respectively, and CWC-AH had the most significant postobturation pain score. During the study, none of the patients needed an emergency visit, the pain score was ranged from (0:1.4). Within the same group, the pain intensity began to significantly decrease for gp1 (CLC-CS) after 24 h, for gp3, gp4, and gp5 (SC-CS, CLC-AH, and CWC-AH, respectively) after 12 h, and for gp2 (CWC-CS) after 6 h. After 72 h, the level of pain in each group was around 0. Regardless of the type of sealer used, no significant difference was found between the type of obturation technique and the postoperative pain intensity (p = 0.124), while regardless of the type of obturation technique used, there was a significant difference in postoperative pain intensity and sealer type (p < 0.001). The incidence of sealer extrusion did not differ significantly between the tested groups (p = 0.499), the results showed that the presence of sealer extrusion was associated with higher significant pain score (p < 0.001).

conclusionThe postoperative pain score after Single-Visit RCT for patient diagnosed as asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis was low to moderate pain score, presence of sealer extrusion increased the postoperative pain intensity. Regardless the type of sealer, different obturation techniques did not associated with postoperative pain intensity, while regardless the obturation technique, AH Plus sealer was associated with higher postoperative pain intensity than CeraSeal sealer. Postoperative pain was related to presence of sealer extrusion.

Indexed as

Postoperative PainRoot Canal Filling MaterialsRoot Canal ObturationRoot Canal TherapyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeRoot Canal Filling MaterialsBioceramic sealerPostoperative painRoot canal treatment (RCT)Single-visit treatment

Identifiers

PMID40931202
PMCPMC12422989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.