Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931198›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2025

Harmonizing mouse anatomy terminology: a common language?

Jesús Ruberte, Paul N Schofield, John P Sundberg, Sergi Olvera-Maneu, Ana Carretero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesús RuberteDepartment of Animal Health and Anatomy, Center for Animal Biotechnology and Gene Therapy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Travessera Dels Turons, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain. jesus.ruberte@uab.es.ORCID 0000-0003-1540-1432
Paul N SchofieldDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5111-7263
John P SundbergThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1523-5430
Sergi Olvera-ManeuDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nicosia School of Veterinary Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0003-4281-6510
Ana CarreteroDepartment of Animal Health and Anatomy, Center for Animal Biotechnology and Gene Therapy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Travessera Dels Turons, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9377-4926

Funding

Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) of the European Union 101082155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse remains the principal animal model for investigating human diseases due, among other reasons, to its anatomical similarities to humans. Despite its widespread use, the assumption that mouse anatomy is a fully established field with standardized and universally accepted terminology is misleading. Many phenotypic anatomical annotations do not refer to the authority or origin of the terminology used, while others inappropriately adopt outdated or human-centric nomenclature. This inconsistency is further exacerbated by the limited availability of comprehensive anatomical references, often compelling researchers to rely on "do-it-yourself" anatomical interpretations when characterizing disease models-an approach that increases the risk of inaccuracies in the absence of expert anatomical guidance. To address this critical gap, we propose the formation of expert working groups comprising comparative anatomists and disease model developers. These groups would be responsible for systematically reviewing the anatomical literature of each mouse organ system and producing consensus-based terminologies aligned with the Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria (NAV), the authoritative standard for quadrupedal species. Such harmonization efforts would not only improve the consistency and reliability of anatomical descriptions in mouse models but also enhance the integration and interoperability of anatomical data across biomedical ontologies and databases, facilitating more robust data mining and translational research.

Indexed as

AnatomyTerminology as TopicAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID40931198
PMCPMC12578732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.