ArticleNeotropical entomology2025
Antibacterial Potential of Lucilia sericata (Meigen, 1826) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) Maggot Excretions/Secretions in Presence of Human Tear Fluid.
Article in Neotropical entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lucilia sericata (Meigen, 1826) maggot excretions/secretions (ES) have demonstrated anti-inflammatory and wound healing potential on corneal epithelial cells. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial potential of the ES against clinically relevant Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Gram-positive Staphylococcus epidermidis in the presence of human tear fluid. The ES was collected from sterile first- and second-instar L. sericata maggots. Antibacterial activity was assessed using colony-forming unit (CFU) and turbidimetric (TB) assays. In CFU assays, samples were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h, followed by serial dilutions and agar plate inoculation. For TB assays, samples were incubated for 16 h at 37 °C, with optical density measured at 550 nm. Against P. aeruginosa, maggot ES exhibited a paradoxical effect: growth inhibition was observed at lower concentrations (0.75 and 1.5 µg/mL), whereas higher concentrations (8-130 µg/mL) showed no antibacterial activity. Addition of human tear fluid led to an enhanced antibacterial activity at the lower concentrations, producing an effect stronger than either tears alone or ES alone. The antibacterial activity was consistent across three maggot batches and remained unaffected by reconstituting maggot ES in phosphate-buffered saline. Heat-inactivation of maggot ES resulted in a loss of its antibacterial activity. Against S. epidermidis, maggot ES showed no antibacterial activity at any of the tested concentrations (1.5-92 µg/mL). Lucilia sericata maggot ES exhibits differential antibacterial effects at lower concentrations, which are enhanced in presence of human tear fluid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40931168What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.