Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931143›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Evaluating the Long-term Effects of Microfocused Ultrasound on Facial Tightening Using Quantitative Instruments: Efficacy and Safety.

Xuangu Li, Guanghui Xie, Zixian Yang, Shenghong Li, Xuan Liao, Jinqiang Lu, Xiao Jiang, Kecheng Li, Shan Xie, Zhidan Zhang and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06286384 (Evaluating the Long-term Effects of Microfocused Ultrasound on Facial Tightening Using Quantitative Instruments), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06286384 completednot on this map

Evaluating the Long-term Effects of Microfocused Ultrasound on Facial Tightening Using Quantitative Instruments: Efficacy and Safety

TypeobservationalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsFacial Aging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Xuangu LiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Guanghui XieDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Zixian YangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Shenghong LiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Xuan LiaoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Jinqiang LuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Xiao JiangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Kecheng LiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Shan XieDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Zhidan ZhangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Liling XiaoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Hailing HuangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Haoran MaoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Jinglong QiaoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Jiaze ZhengDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Hongwei LiuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No. 613 West, Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China. liuhongwei0521@hotmail.com.

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Medical Research Fund A2024412National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFF1206400National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871563National Natural Science Foundation of China 82102345Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2023A03J1033Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2024A03J0823Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2024A03J1041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrofocused ultrasound (MFU) is a non-invasive technique used for facial rejuvenation, yet there is limited quantitative data on its long-term effects. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of MFU for facial rejuvenation. We utilized standardized photography along with advanced skin assessment technologies to analyze the impact of MFU on facial morphology, skin function, and patient satisfaction over a 12-month period.

methodsA prospective clinical study was conducted on 28 healthy female subjects (age range: 33-55 years) who underwent a single MFU treatment. Comprehensive assessments were performed at baseline and at seven follow-up time points (30 minutes, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months). Objective measurements included facial volumetric changes nasolabial fold morphology, skin physical parameters, and clinical aesthetic scores. Patient satisfaction and safety data were also collected. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Longitudinal data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with subject-specific random intercepts to account for repeated measurements.

resultsFacial volume showed significant immediate increase (5.65 ± 2.15 ml, 95% CI: 4.821-6.486, CV=37.98%, P < 0.001, Cohen's d = 2.633) post-treatment, followed by progressive tightening, with maximum volume reduction at 3 months (- 3.37 ± 4.79 ml, 95% CI: - 5.227 to - 1.511, CV=142.26%, P < 0.001, Cohen's d = - 0.703). Both facial and submental regions maintained statistically significant volume reduction through 12 months: Facial region: - 1.86 ± 4.72 ml (P = 0.048, Cohen's d = - 0.39); Submental region: - 1.26±2.22 ml (95% CI: - 2.118 to - 0.394, P < 0.05, Cohen's d = - 0.565),with the submental region demonstrating superior durability. The nasolabial fold region, volume, and maximum depth demonstrated the greatest improvement at 3 months (depth reduction: 0.28 ± 0.08 mm, p < 0.001), with 'wide-short' morphological subtypes exhibiting superior efficacy compared to 'narrow-long' subtypes (P < 0.05). Skin ultrasound collagen intensity showed progressive improvements, peaking at 9 months ( + 10.08 a.u., 95% CI: 7.73-12.44, P < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.54) and remained significantly elevated at 12 months with a 9.03 a.u. increase (95% CI: 6.49 to 11.58, P < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.38). Treatment induced significant, sustained increases in skin hydration (mean + 50.5-55.8 μS; p < 0.05; Cohen's d 0.79-1.06) from 30 minutes through 6 months, with effects becoming non-significant at 9 months (+ 36.4 μS) and returning to baseline by 12 months. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) decreased significantly from 1 month through 9 months, with peak improvement at 6 months (- 3.05 g/m

conclusionMFU facial rejuvenation demonstrated a time-dependent efficacy profile, with peak improvements observed at 3 months and substantial benefits maintained at 9-12 months. Treatment response varied anatomically, showing most durable submental improvement. Nasolabial fold morphological subtypes significantly influenced efficacy, with 'wide-short' morphology correlating with superior outcomes. The procedure provided significant rejuvenation with minimal downtime, high patient satisfaction and an excellent safety profile. Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . Trial Registrations This trial is registered with ChiCTR2400093439 (China) and NCT06286384 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesFaceRejuvenationRhytidoplastySkin AgingUltrasonic TherapyAdultEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealthy VolunteersHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesTime Factors3D imagingFacial rejuvenationLong-term efficacyMicrofocused ultrasoundNasolabial foldQuantitative assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.