ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2026
The evolution of penile reconstructive techniques in urology.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Penile skin necrosis after complex penile surgery with synthetic grafts: a case report.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Advanced genital reconstructive surgery: evolving techniques, expanding indications and future directions.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The need to enhance the quality of life and functionality of patients with a number of diseases, such as congenital abnormalities, traumas, and gender incongruence, has contributed to a significant development in the field of male genital reconstructive surgery. This article highlights the roots of penile reconstructive surgeries over history, emphasizing innovative achievements that have shaped modern practices. Critical advancements that have improved surgical accuracy and post-operative care are examined, including new imaging modalities, penile prosthesis implantation, and complete phallic reconstruction. In terms of future improvements in genital reconstructive surgery, the combination of tissue engineering and microsurgery offers the potential to further improve the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.