Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931086›Full record

ReviewJournal of human hypertension2025

The Linguistics of Hypertension: Is "Essential" Really Primary, or Just Plain Complex?

Victoria D Dahmen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Victoria D DahmenDivision of Experimental Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. vd329@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8105-6034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Stanley Peart Essay Competition is an annual event run by the British and Irish Hypertension Society to encourage Early Career Researchers to continue the ethos of Sir Stanley Peart. Sir Stanley Peart was a clinician and clinical researcher who made a major contribution to our understanding of blood pressure regulation. He was the first to demonstrate the release of noradrenaline in response to sympathetic nerve stimulation. He was also the first to purify, and determine the structure of, angiotensin and he later isolated the enzyme, renin, and carried out many important investigations of the factors controlling its release in the body. This year, the essay topic was "Is Essential Hypertension really Primary or Essential?". In her prize-winning essay, Victoria Dahmen questions the continued use of the term "essential hypertension" suggesting that it may obscure the complex and often modifiable factors contributing to elevated blood pressure. By exploring the roles of salt sensitivity, obesity, and their physiological interplay, her essay calls for a more nuanced, mechanism-based classification of hypertension. Such a shift, she argues, will facilitate clinicians to deliver personalised medicine by aligning medical language with modern scientific understanding.

Indexed as

Blood PressureEssential HypertensionHypertensionLinguisticsTerminology as TopicHumans

Identifiers

PMID40931086
PMCPMC12500465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.