ArticleBJGP open2026
Older Chinese migrants' experiences of remote primary care in England: a semi-structured interview study.
Article in BJGP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the past decade, remote (non-face-to-face) services - including interactions via the telephone and online platforms - have been increasingly used in primary care. These services bring potential benefits, as well as potential barriers, for patients. Older migrants are a population that could face intersectional barriers when accessing health care; it is important to understand the impact of remote services on them.
aimThis study explores older Chinese migrants' experiences of, and attitudes to, remote access to primary care services. DESIGN &
settingA qualitative semi-structured interview study.
methodRecruitment was carried out in 2023, through community organisations, social media, and snowballing. Participants were individuals aged ≥60 years, who self-identified ethnically as Chinese, and were UK residents; they were purposively sampled for maximum variation in sociodemographics and backgrounds. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted in English and Mandarin. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim; if consent to record the interview had not been given, field notes were taken. Transcripts and field notes were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results were shared with participants for verification.
resultsNineteen participants were interviewed. Many technical and practical barriers were reported as existing for the participants when accessing primary care remotely. Due to the different levels of access to resources, these barriers affected the most disadvantaged people to the greatest degree. In addition, participants felt the need for in-person interactions to address some concerns and believed remote services should not replace in-person care.
conclusionOverall, older Chinese migrants felt few benefits from using remote primary care services. In the current digital context of the NHS, it is crucial to keep multimodal services available while rolling out new service modes, and to consider the needs of different populations to ensure equitable access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.