ArticleJournal of safety research2025
Self-reported risk taking predicts handrail use on a stepladder in older adults.
Article in Journal of safety research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIdentify individual factors that predict handrail use and quantify the impact of handrail use on balance while using a stepladder.
backgroundLadders are among the riskiest consumer products especially for older adults. Individual factors such as physiological capacity or risk-taking propensity have been found to influence safety behaviors and fall risk. When available, the use of a handrail is a common safety strategy for stabilizing balance. Thus, there is potential for individual factors to influence handrail use, and for their combined effect to influence balance while using a ladder.
methodParticipants (n = 104) over 65 years completed physiological, cognitive, risk-taking, and stability assessments and were subsequently asked to undertake a lightbulb changing task using a stepladder. A force plate measured the center of pressure under the ladder and videos were analyzed to characterize participant handrail use during the task. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the individual factors associated with handrail use. The effect of handrail use (controlling for individual factors) on stability while completing the ladder task was analyzed.
resultsSelf-reported risk-taking was a predictor of handrail use, where a lower risk-taking score correlated with a higher probability of using the handrail. Individuals with poor balance were more likely to use the handrail, but self-reported risk-taking was a stronger mediator of handrail use. Neither the use of the handrail nor the individual factors were found to influence stability during the ladder task, suggesting a more complex relationship between individual behavior and physical ability on stability in hazardous working conditions.
conclusionThis study suggests that self-reported rating of risk-taking is associated with observable behaviors during ladder use. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Such ratings may be useful in screening safety behaviors of older ladder users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.