Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40930576›Full record

ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2025

Limited utility of faecal immunochemical testing in a colorectal cancer screening programme for adults with cystic fibrosis: insights from a prospective UK study.

Aqeem Azam, Karuna Sapru, Andrew M Jones, Dipesh H Vasant, Anne-Marie Kelly, Graham Horsman, Rowland J Bright-Thomas, Javaid Iqbal, Peter J Barry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aqeem AzamManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK aqeem.azam@mft.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9270-1127
Karuna SapruManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Andrew M JonesManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Dipesh H VasantThe University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2329-0616
Anne-Marie KellyManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Graham HorsmanManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Rowland J Bright-ThomasManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Javaid IqbalManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Peter J BarryManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePeople with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) are at significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), prompting international recommendations for earlier screening with colonoscopy. The utility of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) as a screening adjunct in pwCF remains unclear. This study evaluates FIT's diagnostic performance and uptake within a CRC screening programme in a UK CF centre.

methodsPwCF aged ≥40 years were invited in person to participate in a screening protocol including FIT and colonoscopy. FIT results were interpreted using three thresholds: ≥10 µg Hb/g (primary), ≥80 µg Hb/g and ≥120 µg Hb/g. Colonoscopy findings and polyp histology were recorded.

resultsOf 113 eligible patients, 66 (58.4%) returned FIT, 49 (43.4%) had FIT and colonoscopy, and 27 (23.9%) underwent colonoscopy only. Colonic polyps were detected in 27.6% (21/76), which were predominantly adenomatous, and no CRCs were detected. For polyp detection, FIT demonstrated poor sensitivity (14%) and modest specificity (86%) at the 10 µg Hb/g threshold. Quantitative FIT values did not correlate with polyp presence (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.48). Bowel preparation was generally adequate (mean Boston Bowel Preparation Scale 6.8), with a low repeat colonoscopy rate (14.5%).

conclusionIn this study, no cancer was detected in 76 consecutive eligible individuals who underwent colonoscopy. In 49 patients who had both FIT and colonoscopy, FIT did not aid colonic polyp detection, showing low sensitivity and no correlation between faecal haemoglobin and adenoma detection. Given the high adenoma prevalence, the limitations of FIT and the poor FIT return rate, colonoscopy should remain the preferred modality for CRC screening in pwCF.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCystic FibrosisEarly Detection of CancerOccult BloodAdultAgedColonic PolypsColonoscopyFecesFemaleHemoglobinsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProspective StudiesHemoglobinsCOLONIC ADENOMASCOLONOSCOPYCOLORECTAL CANCER SCREENINGCYSTIC FIBROSIS

Identifiers

PMID40930576
PMCPMC12421605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.