SynthesisBMJ open2025
Proximal core strengthening training for anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention with biomechanical improvements in knee/hip kinematics and strength gains: a systematic review and meta-analysis of low-certainty evidence.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluated the effects of proximal core training on biomechanical risk factors and strength parameters in individuals at high risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (specifically: those exhibiting pathological movement patterns, neuromuscular deficits or biomechanical risk factors) and compared direct versus indirect interventions. We hypothesised that targeted training enhances dynamic knee stabilisation and hip control during high-risk manoeuvres, with direct approaches providing superior biomechanical benefits through neuromuscular control optimisation.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. DATA SOURCES: We searched (PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO Academic Search Premier (ASP)+Business Source Premier (BSP)) for relevant literature published between its inception and the date of retrieval (22 April 2024). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: This study included studies comparing the effects of proximal core intensification training and lower extremity training, evaluated their influences on biomechanical risk factors and strength parameters in three types of high-risk ACL populations, and compared the direct and indirect intervention effects. The three types of people include: (1) athletes with pathological exercise patterns, (2) those with neuromuscular defects after ACL injury/reconstruction and (3) those without injury but with biomechanical risk factors. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration and Evidence Project tools. A meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models. Findings were summarised in GRADE evidence profiles and synthesised qualitatively.
results24 studies with a total of 749 participants were included. Meta-analyses demonstrated that proximal core strengthening training may increase lower extremity muscle strength (quadriceps peak torque: standardised mean differences (SMD)=0.65, 95% CI (0.29 to 1.01), I²=0%; hamstring peak torque: SMD=0.53, 95% CI (0.14 to 0.92), I²=0%; both p<0.05, low-quality evidence). For movement kinematics, task-dependent improvements were observed: peak knee flexion angle likely increased during jumping (SMD=0.58, 95% CI (0.20 to 0.96), I²=32%) and single-leg squatting (SMD=0.60, 95% CI (0.07 to 1.26), I²=0%) (both p≤0.05, low-quality evidence) but may have little meaningful effect during walking (low-quality evidence). Peak hip flexion may substantially increase during jumping (SMD=0.83, 95% CI (0.19 to 1.47), I²=0%, p<0.05, low-quality evidence), while core endurance may improve (plank time: SMD=0.63, 95% CI (0.12 to 1.13), I²=0%, p<0.05, low-quality evidence).
conclusionsProximal core training has the potential to improve core endurance, knee kinematics and lower limb strength in individuals at high risk of ACL injury, but evidence remains limited to late postoperative and exercise studies. Standardised protocols and harm rate validation are needed to confirm the preventive effectiveness of multidimensional protocols. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024532199.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.