ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Intervention in Healthcare Teams to Promote Adherence to the Integration of Care for People at Risk of Pressure Injuries Between Hospitals and Communities: A Scoping Review.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rehabilitation Workforce Interventions for Pressure Ulcer Prevention: A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Intervention in Healthcare Teams to Promote Adherence to the Integration of Care for People at Risk of Pressure Injuries Between Hospitals and Communities: A Scoping Review.International wound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pressure injuries (PIs) remain a problem for patient safety and the sustainability of healthcare systems. Difficulties persist in their assessment, prevention and monitoring by multidisciplinary teams. International recommendations point to this problem as a priority area for resolution in terms of patient safety. Research on the subject has been positive, resulting in several guidelines for clinical practice, but professionals' adherence remains below what is expected for their implementation. This scoping review aimed to identify interventions that increase multidisciplinary teams' adherence to the prevention and management of PIs between hospitals and the communities. The search was carried out in the MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, JBI, Cochrane and grey literature databases by two independent reviewers, and led to the identification of 16 articles that met the eligibility criteria and made it possible to answer the research question. Strategies to improve adherence by health professionals include the creation and training of multidisciplinary teams, the implementation of new risk assessment models, Wound Boards, injury prevention reminders, video consultation apps, multidisciplinary rounds, documentation and recording. No studies were identified that assessed staff adherence to interventions aimed at preventing and managing PIs in the continuum between hospitals and communities, which is suggestive of the need for further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.