Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40930078›Full record

ArticleOnline journal of public health informatics2025

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Content on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Popular #PTSD Posts.

Brittany Rohl, Laura Carolyn Jones, Rachel Nattis, Robert Dale Claar, Xavier Velez, Joy Gabrielli, John Williamson, Eric Porges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Online journal of public health informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brittany Rohl *Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32610, United States, 1 (352) 273-6617.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9872-731X
Laura Carolyn Jones *Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32610, United States, 1 (352) 273-6617.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5714-0413
Rachel NattisClinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32610, United States, 1 (352) 273-6617.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7315-6956
Robert Dale ClaarClinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32610, United States, 1 (352) 273-6617.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4803-1685
Xavier VelezClinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32610, United States, 1 (352) 273-6617.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9645-870X
Joy GabrielliClinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32610, United States, 1 (352) 273-6617.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8003-6078
John WilliamsonDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9456-1797
Eric PorgesClinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32610, United States, 1 (352) 273-6617.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-5859

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: TikTok became an increasingly popular platform for mental health discussions during a major global stressor (COVID-19 pandemic). On TikTok, content assumed to promote user engagement is delivered in a hyperindividually curated manner through a proprietary algorithm. Mental health providers have raised concerns about TikTok's potential role in promoting inaccurate self-diagnoses, pathologizing normal behaviors, and fostering new-onset symptoms after exposure to illness-related content, such as tic-like movements linked to conversion or factitious disorders. The accuracy of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related content with respect to conveying symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment deserves further investigation. Objective: This study aimed to characterize the accuracy of PTSD-related TikTok content. Methods: In February 2022, a search was conducted on TikTok using the hashtag #PTSD, and the 100 most-liked videos were retrieved. Videos were excluded if they were in a non-English language, duplicated, unrelated to PTSD, lacked audio, or contained nonfunctioning links. A publicly available Python package (TikTokPy) was used to scrape available metadata (views, shares, etc). Using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-AV), videos were independently coded by 2 reviewers for the overall accuracy of the video (useful, personal experience, or misleading), whether the creator self-identified as a health care professional, symptoms mentioned, and overall video understandability and actionability. A third reviewer was consulted in the rare instances of coding disagreements. Results: Of the 100 included videos, 29 were classified as useful, 59 were classified as personal experience (subjective experience without outright inaccuracies), and 12 were classified as misleading. The degree to which PTSD-related information was accurate was not associated with its understandability, actionability, or user engagement. Besides useful videos being longer (mean 88.7, SD 63.1 seconds) than personal experience videos (mean 42.7, SD 44.5 seconds), no group differences in video metadata were observed across the number of views, likes, shares, or comments (P>.05). While self-identified HCPs were more likely to post useful content, they also contributed to 33% (4/12) of misleading videos. Changes in cognition and mood were the most frequently reported symptoms of PTSD (38/100, 38% of videos). Conclusions: Our findings were roughly consistent with previous studies of mental health-related TikTok content accuracy, although this is variable by diagnosis. TikTok's continuously adaptive algorithmic content delivery may expose users to nonspecific and potentially misleading "click-bait" mental health information, which could influence symptom interpretation and clinical presentation. Clinicians should be aware of the digital landscape shaping patients' perceptions of PTSD.

Indexed as

health communicationposttraumatic stress disorderPTSDsocial mediaTikTok

Identifiers

PMID40930078
PMCPMC12422738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.