Observational studyJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2025
Inhaler identification: evaluating a potential screening method for adherence in chronic respiratory disease management.
Observational study in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study explores the relationship between inhaler visual identification, naming, and adherence outcomes, and evaluates the potential of combining these factors into a screening tool for identifying poor adherence.
methodsThis observational, prospective study included adult patients with COPD, asthma, or asthma+COPD who had been on chronic inhalation therapy for at least the past year. Data were collected through patient interviews and medical records. Adherence was assessed using the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) questionnaire and prescription records, calculated as the Proportion of Days Covered (PDC). The patients completed a questionnaire to evaluate their ability to visually identify and name their inhalers.
resultsAmong the 196 participants, significant differences in adherence levels were observed across the COPD, asthma, and asthma+COPD groups, with COPD patients demonstrating higher adherence rates (p=0.001). Concordance between TAI and PDC was highest in the COPD group (75.0%), compared to the asthma (51.3%) and asthma+COPD (55.5%) groups. Correct naming of inhalers was not significantly correlated with adherence. However, correct inhaler visual identification was associated with better adherence. Incorrect visual identification showed low sensitivity (15.9%) but high specificity (92.6%) for detecting poorly adherent patients.
conclusionsThe ability to visually identify inhalers was associated with better adherence, while the ability to name inhalers was not. Although incorrect visual identification has limited utility as a screening tool, it may still serve as a rapid and practical method for identifying poorly adherent patients in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.