ReviewCritical care science2025
The PROtective VEntilation (PROVE) Network - advancing research and collaboration in mechanical ventilation.
Review in Critical care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The PROtective VEntilation (PROVE) Network is a globally-recognized collaborative research group dedicated to advancing research, education, and collaboration in the field of mechanical ventilation. Established to address critical questions in intraoperative and intensive care ventilation, the network focuses on improving outcomes for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in diverse settings, including operating rooms, intensive care units, burn units, and resource-limited environments in low- and middle-income countries. The PROVE Network is committed to generating high-quality evidence through a comprehensive portfolio of investigations, including randomized clinical trials, observational research, and meta-analyses. Its work has significantly contributed to understanding optimal ventilation strategies in critically ill patients, such as those with COVID-19, and in exploring innovative approaches like closed-loop ventilation systems. The network has spearheaded pioneering studies that have shaped clinical practice worldwide by integrating expertise from a wide range of disciplines. A defining feature of the PROVE Network is its emphasis on mentorship and collaboration. It fosters a supportive environment where junior researchers are guided by experienced mentors, ensuring the transfer of knowledge and promoting inclusivity. The network prioritizes gender balance and diversity, recognizing the value of varied perspectives in driving meaningful innovation and advancing research excellence. This paper reviews the history, key projects, and leadership of the PROVE Network, highlighting its impactful contributions to the field of mechanical ventilation. By uniting researchers globally, the PROVE Network exemplifies the power of collaboration in addressing complex clinical challenges, including personalized ventilation and the use of Artificial Intelligence, and improving patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.