ArticleArquivos de gastroenterologia2025
COMPARING THE PREDICTIVE EFFICACY OF MELD AND ALBI SCORES IN LIVER CIRRHOSIS PATIENTS WITH ACUTE UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING.
Article in Arquivos de gastroenterologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a critical medical emergency and is a common cause of illness and death in individuals with liver cirrhosis.
objectiveThe point of this study was to check how well the albumin-to-bilirubin ratio (ALBI) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores could predict how these patients would do in the future.
methodsThe Imam Khomeini Hospital gastroenterology department conducted a retrospective examination. We admitted 102 patients with AUGIB and liver cirrhosis from April 2021 to September 2023. The study included a full medical history and clinical evaluation upon admission, as well as all laboratory test results throughout the hospital stay. We diagnosed liver cirrhosis using clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data. We diagnosed AUGIB as having hematemesis, melena, or hematochezia. We then tested the ALBI, MELD, and liver and kidney function. Some criteria allow continuous variable comparison, whereas others allow discrete variable comparison. Death during hospitalization and rebleeding were the key outcomes, with one-month mortality assessed. We compared ALBI and MELD before establishing their relationship to mortality and rebleeding.
resultsOf the 102 patients, 68.5% survived. Upon arrival, we noted a markedly elevated prevalence of edema, ascites, and chilly extremities among patients who did not survive. The MELD and ALBI scoring systems effectively forecast in-hospital mortality. The threshold for MELD is 21 (CI: 0.759-0.930, P=0.00), whereas for ALBI it is -2.3 (CI: 0.865-0.950, P=0.01). Neither party could foresee hospitalization or premature rebleeding. The probability of death may be forecasted using the MELD during the first discharge phase (P<0.05).
conclusionThe MELD and ALBI scores show a suitable ability to predict short-term outcomes and both of them can predict death and rebleeding, as well as 1-month mortality. Nevertheless, we recommend that in individuals with advanced liver cirrhosis, the MELD score is a more accurate prognostic indicator compared to the ALBI score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.