Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40929409›Full record

ArticleBrazilian oral research2025

Surface properties of direct restorations and adjacent dental tissues after saliva exposure.

Patrícia Valéria Manozzo Kunz, Roberta da Veiga, Vania Camargo, Marina da Rosa Kaizer, Gisele Maria Correr, Carla Castiglia Gonzaga

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrícia Valéria Manozzo KunzUniversidade Positivo, School of Health Sciences, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2581-0929
Roberta da VeigaUniversidade Positivo, School of Health Sciences, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3382-8433
Vania CamargoUniversidade Positivo, School of Health Sciences, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1840-0101
Marina da Rosa KaizerUniversidade Positivo, School of Health Sciences, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-6089
Gisele Maria CorrerUniversidade Positivo, School of Health Sciences, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5032-0948
Carla Castiglia GonzagaUniversidade Positivo, School of Health Sciences, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6374-1605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the effect of saliva exposure on roughness (Ra) and Vickers hardness (VHN) of two direct restorative materials, enamel, and dentin adjacent to the restorations. Enamel and dentin cavities in molars (n = 10) were restored with a) bulk-fill resin composite (Tetric N-Flow Bulk Fill, BF) with the application of a universal adhesive (Tetric N-Bond Universal) and b) alkasite restorative material (Cention N, CN) with and without the application of a universal adhesive. After 24 h (baseline), surface roughness and hardness of the restorative material and dental tissues were assessed at 100 μm from the tooth/restoration interface. The specimens were subjected to degradation in whole saliva for 7 days (combined with the application of 20% sucrose 10x/day). Ra and VHN were then reassessed. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 5%). BF exhibited a significantly lower Ra than CN. Ra increased significantly after degradation in saliva when compared to baseline values. Enamel hardness was higher for BF restorations. No differences in enamel hardness were observed for alkasite restorations with and without adhesive application. For dentin hardness, significantly lower values were found in alkasite restorations with previous application of an adhesive system. It can be concluded that BF had a smoother surface than CN before and after degradation. Immersion in saliva reduced the hardness of both restorative materials, enamel, and dentin adjacent to the restoration.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental EnamelDental Restoration, PermanentDentinSalivaAnalysis of VarianceHardnessHumansMaterials TestingReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsResin CementsSurface PropertiesTime FactorsComposite ResinsResin Cements

Identifiers

PMID40929409
PMCPMC12419195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.