ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Proanthocyanidin associated to vitamin E or palm oil on initial enamel erosion: in situ and in vitro study.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erosive Potential of Commercially Available Cannabis Beverages.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This in vitro study evaluated the effect of proanthocyanidin, palm oil, and vitamin E against initial erosion. Bovine enamel blocks (n = 140) were divided into 14 groups: C+_SnCl2/NaF/Am-F-containing solution (positive control); C-_deionized water (negative control); O_palm oil; P6.5_6.5% proanthocyanidin; P2_2% proanthocyanidin; E_Vitamin E (97.8% oily tocopherol acetate); OP6.5_palm oil + 6.5% proanthocyanidin; P6.5O_6.5% proanthocyanidin + palm oil; OP2_palm oil + 2% proanthocyanidin; P2O_2% proanthocyanidin + palm oil; EP6.5_Vitamin E + 6.5% proanthocyanidin; P6.5E_6.5% proanthocyanidin + Vitamin E; EP2_Vitamin E + 2% proanthocyanidin; P2E_2% proanthocyanidin + Vitamin E. The acquired enamel pellicle (AEP) was previously formed in situ for 30 min. The specimens were treated in vitro with the solutions (500 µL, 30s). Then, the blocks were maintained for an additional hour in oral cavity to develop the modified AEP. The blocks were immersed in 0.5% citric acid (pH 2.5) during 30s. The response variable was the percentage of surface hardness loss (%SHL). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Fisher's LSD test (p<0.05). P6.5E (12±7_%SHL) was the only group that promoted similar protection to C+ (11±8_%SHL). O (17±13_%SHL), P2 (20±10_%SHL), OP6.5 (19±12_%SHL), P2O (21±13_%SHL), P6.5E (12±7_%SHL), and P2E (19±9_%SHL) exhibited %SHL similar to both C+ and C- (25±10_%SHL) groups (p<0.05). P6.5 (23±11_%SHL), E (27±8_%SHL), P6.5O (24±13_%SHL), OP2 (27±12_%SHL), EP6.5 (24±11_%SHL), and EP2 (26±11_%SHL) were different to C+ and similar to C-. It was concluded that the combination of 6.5% proanthocyanidin and vitamin E (P6.5E) was the most effective strategy against enamel erosion, aligning closely with the positive control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.