Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40929399›Full record

ArticleBrazilian oral research2025

Influence of residual buccal bone thickness in dehiscence defects on osseointegrated dental implants in healed sites: an experimental in vivo study.

Guilherme Carlos Beiruth Freire, Patricia Furtado Gonçalves, Suzana Peres Pimentel, Francisco Humberto Nociti Júnior, Márcio Zafalon Casati, Bruno César de Vasconcelos Gurgel

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guilherme Carlos Beiruth FreireUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte -UFRN, Department of Dentistry, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4871-2766
Patricia Furtado GonçalvesUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucury - UFVJM, Department of Dentistry, Diamantina, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1782-9654
Suzana Peres PimentelUniversidade Paulista - UNIP, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Division, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3577-8600
Francisco Humberto Nociti JúniorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, Department of Prosthesis and Periodontology, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6809-8866
Márcio Zafalon CasatiUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, Department of Prosthesis and Periodontology, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9234-0536
Bruno César de Vasconcelos GurgelUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte -UFRN, Department of Dentistry, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-134X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to histomorphometrically evaluate the effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) and two implant surfaces on the thickness and height of newly formed bone in dehiscence defects around titanium implants. Three premolars and the first bilateral molar were extracted from ten adult mongrel dogs, and 40 buccal bone dehiscences measuring 5 mm in height and 4 mm in width were created using a University of North Carolina (UNC) periodontal probe to confirm the dimensions. Forty implants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: oxidized implant surfaces (OIS, n = 10), turned/machined implant surfaces (TIS, n = 10), OIS + GBR (n = 10), and TIS + GBR (n = 10). After 3 months, the dogs were euthanized, and the blocks containing the implants and adjacent bone were processed for non-decalcified histological analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA and the Pearson correlation (p = 0.05). The results showed that GBR significantly influenced both the vertical (height) and horizontal (thickness) dimensions of the newly formed bone (p < 0.001). Strong positive correlations were observed between the thickness and height of newly formed bone at the base of the defect, as well as between the thickness of the bone at the base of the defect and the thickness of newly formed bone in the central region of the defect. No significant correlations were found between implant surface type and bone formation. Bone regeneration occurred in both the vertical and horizontal directions, with greater bone growth in GBR-treated groups, irrespective of implant surface type (oxidized or turned).

Indexed as

Alveolar ProcessBone RegenerationDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsGuided Tissue Regeneration, PeriodontalOsseointegrationSurgical Wound DehiscenceAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsDogsMaleRandom AllocationReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsSurface PropertiesTime FactorsDental ImplantsTitanium

Identifiers

PMID40929399
PMCPMC12419196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.