ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Influence of residual buccal bone thickness in dehiscence defects on osseointegrated dental implants in healed sites: an experimental in vivo study.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to histomorphometrically evaluate the effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) and two implant surfaces on the thickness and height of newly formed bone in dehiscence defects around titanium implants. Three premolars and the first bilateral molar were extracted from ten adult mongrel dogs, and 40 buccal bone dehiscences measuring 5 mm in height and 4 mm in width were created using a University of North Carolina (UNC) periodontal probe to confirm the dimensions. Forty implants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: oxidized implant surfaces (OIS, n = 10), turned/machined implant surfaces (TIS, n = 10), OIS + GBR (n = 10), and TIS + GBR (n = 10). After 3 months, the dogs were euthanized, and the blocks containing the implants and adjacent bone were processed for non-decalcified histological analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA and the Pearson correlation (p = 0.05). The results showed that GBR significantly influenced both the vertical (height) and horizontal (thickness) dimensions of the newly formed bone (p < 0.001). Strong positive correlations were observed between the thickness and height of newly formed bone at the base of the defect, as well as between the thickness of the bone at the base of the defect and the thickness of newly formed bone in the central region of the defect. No significant correlations were found between implant surface type and bone formation. Bone regeneration occurred in both the vertical and horizontal directions, with greater bone growth in GBR-treated groups, irrespective of implant surface type (oxidized or turned).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.