Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40929248›Full record

ArticleScience translational medicine2025

A soft robotic device for rapid and self-guided intubation.

David A Haggerty, James R Cazzoli, Marvin A Wayne, Christopher J Winckler, David A Wampler, Jeffrey L Jarvis, Lichy Han, Linus Rydell, Aman Mahajan, Jose P Zevallos and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Vine-Inspired Soft Robotics: Materials, Actuations, and Emerging Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David A HaggertyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9393-6865
James R CazzoliVine Medical Inc., Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-8408-6153
Marvin A WayneWhatcom County Emergency Medical Services, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6190-958X
Christopher J WincklerUniversity of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
David A WamplerUniversity of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4993-9989
Jeffrey L JarvisFort Worth Office of the Medical Director, Fort Worth, TX 76116, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1435-5115
Lichy HanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Linus RydellDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-5690-0466
Aman MahajanUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Jose P ZevallosUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
David R DroverDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6633-3295
Elliot W HawkesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0420-5025

Funding

Research in Anesthesia Training Program (ReAP)T32GM089626 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Vivianne L Tawfik · 2010 to 2026
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM089626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endotracheal intubation is a critical medical procedure for protecting a patient's airway. Current intubation technology requires extensive anatomical knowledge, training, technical skill, and a clear view of the glottic opening. However, all of these may be limited during emergency care for trauma and cardiac arrest outside the hospital, where first-pass failure is nearly 35%. To address this challenge, we designed a soft robotic device to autonomously guide a breathing tube into the trachea with the goal of allowing rapid, repeatable, and safe intubation without the need for extensive training, skill, anatomical knowledge, or a glottic view. During initial device testing with highly trained users in a mannequin and a cadaver, we found a 100% success rate and an average intubation duration of under 8 s. We then conducted a preliminary study comparing the device with video laryngoscopy, in which prehospital medical providers with 5 min of device training intubated cadavers. When using the device, users achieved an 87% first-pass success rate and a 96% overall success rate, requiring an average of 1.1 attempts and 21 s for successful intubation, significantly (

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealRoboticsCadaverHumansLaryngoscopyManikins

Identifiers

PMID40929248
PMCPMC12812450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.