ArticlePloS one2025
Evolutionary features of microscopic damage in shale under unloading action.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To reveal the microscopic damage evolution law of rocks under the effect of unloading disturbances with different amplitudes, electron microscope scanning, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and triaxial compression tests were carried out. The evolution patterns of surface and internal pore types and mechanical properties of rock specimens after unloading perturbation were analyzed. In this paper, a classification of the ratio of dmax/dmin (dmax and dmin refer to the maximum and minimum pore size of each pore, respectively) is proposed to examine the pore and crack evolution extension development on the surface of the specimen. Meanwhile, the T2 energy spectrum with pore size classification is used to examine the damage quantification law of the pore and crack extension evolution inside the specimen. Finally, the statistical damage model of unloaded disturbed rock is established through theoretical derivation, and the accuracy of the model is verified by experimental data. The study shows that: (1) With the increase of unloading amplitude, there is an increase in the number of nascent cracks and a tendency to expand, which is caused by shear extension cracks; with the increase of unloading amplitude, there is a tendency for the microporosity to shift to the mesoporosity, and the mesoporosity has a tendency to shift to the macroporosity, and there is a decrease in the number of micropores as a whole, which indicates that there is almost no new pore sprouting. (2) When the unloading amplitude is less than 20MPa, with the increase of the unloading amplitude, the pore ratio and expansion rate of the specimen increase slowly; when the unloading amplitude is more than 20MPa, with the increase of the unloading amplitude, the pore ratio and expansion rate of the specimen have a significant tendency to increase. (3) With the increase of unloading amplitude, the shale shear strength limit value decreases more slowly, the modulus of elasticity and shear strength also show a similar pattern of change, and the same way to derive the rock Poisson's ratio does not change much.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.