ArticlePloS one2025
A scoping review of women's experiences and barriers in automated vehicle research.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated vehicles (AVs) have the potential to enhance transportation for all, but current research suggests that women remain less engaged and more hesitant toward their adoption. This scoping review systematically analyses 34 peer-reviewed studies published between 2016 and 2025 to assess how women's experiences, needs, and concerns are represented in AV research. Using thematic analysis, we identify key facilitators and barriers to AV adoption and map them onto a Socio-Ecological Model spanning five levels: individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy. Our findings reveal a critical gap: while gender is frequently recorded as a demographic variable, women are rarely centred as primary users or co-creators in AV design and evaluation. Most studies rely on quantitative, mixed-gender approaches, with limited use of qualitative or participatory methods that could surface the nuanced realities of women's mobility. As a result, vital concerns-such as safety, emotional comfort, caregiving roles, and design exclusion-are often overlooked in AV research. To address this, we introduce the WISE-AV Framework (Women-Informed Socio-Ecological Framework), which organises the multi-level influences shaping women's engagement with AVs. This framework extends the Socio-Ecological Model with a gender lens and integrates principles from feminist HCI to emphasise transparency, participation, and embodied experience. Our study offers both theoretical and practical contributions: it provides a roadmap for researchers, designers, and policymakers to create more inclusive AV systems, and it delivers actionable recommendations to ensure that AVs are not just technologically advanced-but socially equitable. We argue that AVs can only fulfil their promise of safer, smarter mobility when they are designed not for a generic "user," but with the diverse realities of women in mind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.