ArticlePloS one2025
Matrix games between full siblings in Mendelian populations.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary path from a prisoner's dilemma to a harmony game via hawk-dove games.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Survival cost sharing among altruistic full siblings in Mendelian population.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We develop a model that integrates evolutionary matrix game theory with Mendelian genetics. Within this framework, we define the genotype dynamics that describes how the frequencies of genotypes change in sexual diploid populations. We show that our formal definition of evolutionary stability for genotype distributions implies the stability of the corresponding interior equilibrium point in the genotype dynamics. We apply our findings to a model of familial selection, where the survival rates of siblings in monogamous families are determined by a matrix game between them. According to Mendelian inheritance, the behaviour associated with each genotype is uniquely determined by an autosomal (recessive-dominant or intermediate) allele pair. We provide general conditions for the evolutionary stability of homozygote populations. We find that the payoff matrix and the genotype-phenotype map together determine this stability. In numerical examples we consider the prisoner's dilemma between siblings. Based on the evolutionary stability of the pure cooperator and defector states, we provide a potential classification of the genotype dynamics. We distinguish between two cases: one in which the total survival rate is higher in cooperator-cooperator interactions ("coordinated" case), and another in which it is higher in cooperator-defector interactions ("anti-coordinated" case). In the coordinated case, global stability of cooperator homozygote population is possible but not necessary, since bistability, stable coexistence of cooperators and defectors, and even global stability of the defector homozygote state are all possible, depending on the interaction between the phenotypic payoff matrix and the genotype-phenotype mapping. In the anti-coordinated case, the cooperator homozygote population cannot be stable. Thus, similarly to the group selection theory, the welfare of the family (the sum of the survival rates of siblings) governs the emergence of cooperative behavior among family members. Finally, in the case of the donation game, the classical Hamilton's rule determines whether the homozygous cooperator or the homozygous defector population is stable; bistability or stable coexistence are impossible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.