Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40929179›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Potential impact, costs, and benefits of population-wide screening interventions for tuberculosis in Viet Nam: A mathematical modelling study.

Alvaro Schwalb, Katherine C Horton, Jon C Emery, Martin J Harker, Lara Goscé, Lara D Veeken, Frances L Garden, Hai Viet Nguyen, Thu-Anh Nguyen, Khanh Luu Boi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cost-effectiveness of community tuberculosis screening in South Africa.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. The role of medical imaging in translational research into early pulmonary tuberculosis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Alvaro SchwalbTB Modelling Group, TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6518-9719
Katherine C HortonTB Modelling Group, TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7542-4065
Jon C EmeryTB Modelling Group, TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-7604
Martin J HarkerTB Modelling Group, TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-3517
Lara GoscéTB Modelling Group, TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6271
Lara D VeekenDepartment of Internal Medicine and Radboud Community for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2230-4884
Frances L GardenSouth West Sydney Clinical Campuses, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1653-3031
Hai Viet NguyenMinistry of Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1547-6541
Thu-Anh NguyenThe University of Sydney Vietnam Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2089-2902
Khanh Luu BoiWoolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Frank CobelensDepartment of Global Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4367-1133
Greg J FoxFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4085-1411
Van Luong DinhNational Lung Hospital, National Tuberculosis Control Programme, Hanoi, Viet Nam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5145-3657
Hoa Binh NguyenNational Lung Hospital, National Tuberculosis Control Programme, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Guy B MarksSouth West Sydney Clinical Campuses, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8976-8053
Rein M G J HoubenTB Modelling Group, TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-7467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population-wide screening may accelerate the decline of tuberculosis (TB) incidence, but the optimal screening algorithm and duration must weigh resource considerations. We calibrated a deterministic transmission model to TB epidemiology in Viet Nam. We simulated three population-wide screening algorithms from 2025: sputum nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra) only; chest radiography (CXR) followed by NAAT; and CXR-only without microbiological confirmation. We determined the annual screening rounds required to reduce pulmonary TB prevalence below 50 per 100,000 people. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), representing the additional costs (in US$) per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted compared to business-as-usual by 2050. Additionally, we evaluated the impact of NAAT cartridges costing US$1 each. NAAT-based algorithms required at least six rounds to reach the prevalence threshold, while CXR-only required three. NAAT-only achieved a prevalence reduction consistent with the ACT3 trial after three rounds. The CXR+NAAT algorithm averted 4.29m DALYs (95%UI:2.86-6.14) at US$225 (95%UI:85-520) per DALY averted compared with business-as-usual. The front-loaded investment of US$161m (95%UI:111-224) annually during the intervention resulted in average annual cost savings of US$12.7m (95%UI:6.7-21.4) up to 2050 compared to the business-as-usual counterfactual. Reducing the cost of NAAT to US$1 led to a 50% and 15% reduction in budget impact and a 63% and 26% reduction in the estimated ICER for the NAAT-only and CXR+NAAT algorithms, respectively. In Viet Nam, population-wide screening could achieve ambitious policy goals. Substantial front-loaded investment is immediately followed by persistent cost savings and could be further offset by more affordable NAATs.

Identifiers

PMID40929179
PMCPMC12422431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.