Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40929162›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Utilizing CNNs for classification and uncertainty quantification for 15 families of European fly pollinators.

Thomas Stark, Michael Wurm, Valentin Ştefan, Felicitas Wolf, Hannes Taubenböck, Tiffany M Knight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas StarkGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-7541
Michael WurmGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany.
Valentin ŞtefanDepartment of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Felicitas WolfDepartment of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Hannes TaubenböckGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4360-9126
Tiffany M KnightDepartment of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollination is essential for maintaining biodiversity and ensuring food security, and in Europe it is primarily mediated by four insect orders (Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera). However, traditional monitoring methods are costly and time consuming. Although recent automation efforts have focused on butterflies and bees, flies, a diverse and ecologically important group of pollinators, have received comparatively little attention, likely due to the challenges posed by their subtle morphological differences. In this study, we investigate the application of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for classifying 15 European pollinating fly families and quantifying the associated classification uncertainty. In curating our dataset, we ensured that the images of Diptera captured diverse visual characteristics relevant for classification, including wing morphology and general body habitus. We evaluated the performance of three CNNs, ResNet18, MobileNetV3, and EfficientNetB4 and estimated the prediction confidence using Monte Carlo methods, combining test-time augmentation and dropout to approximate both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these models in accurately distinguishing fly families. We achieved an overall accuracy of up to 95.61%, with a mean relative increase in accuracy of 5.58% when comparing uncropped to cropped images. Furthermore, cropping images to the Diptera bounding boxes not only improved classification performance across all models but also increased mean prediction confidence by 8.56%, effectively reducing misclassifications among families. This approach represents a significant advance in automated pollinator monitoring and has promising implications for both scientific research and practical applications.

Indexed as

DipteraNeural Networks, ComputerPollinationAnimalsEuropeUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID40929162
PMCPMC12422425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.