ArticlePloS one2025
An improved nuclei isolation protocol from leaf tissue for single-cell transcriptomics.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in single-cell and spatial multi-omics for plant development and stress responses.Plant diversity · 2026Review
- Why "Where" Matters as Much as "How Much": Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Multi-Level Approaches for Assessing Molecular and Physiological Traits of Drought and Heat Stress Tolerance in Plant Reproductive Development.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of plant biology has traditionally focused on investigations conducted at the tissue, organ, or whole plant level. However, single-cell transcriptomics has recently emerged as an important tool for plant biology, enabling researchers to uncover the expression profiles of individual cell types within a tissue. The application of this tool has revealed new insights into cell-to-cell gene expression heterogeneity and has opened new avenues for research in plant biology. A critical step in the successful application of single-cell and single-nuclei RNA-seq (scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq) is the isolation of individual cells or nuclei, respectively, from tissue to recover their transcriptional profile. A critical step during nuclei isolation for snRNA-seq studies is Fluorescent-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). During this step, nuclei stained with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) can be sorted and separated from cell debris and organelles. Leaf tissue presents a unique challenge due to its high content of chloroplasts, which can interfere with obtaining high-quality results. Because DAPI can also bind to the plastid genome, these organelles will be sorted as nuclei. Thus, in tissues with a high content of chloroplasts, we have a high contamination of these organelles and an overestimation of the number of nuclei. In this study, we introduce a straightforward alternative method for isolating nuclei from Zea mays leaves with reduced chloroplast contamination. By effectively removing chloroplasts during the FACS step of our protocol, using the autofluorescence from the chloroplasts, we achieved improved alignment of reads to the genome and transcriptome. Our enhanced protocol offers a valuable solution for applying snRNA-seq in tissues with a high content of chloroplasts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.