Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40929116›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

acmgscaler: an R package and Colab for standardized gene-level variant effect score calibration within the ACMG/AMP framework.

Mihaly Badonyi, Joseph A Marsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mihaly BadonyiMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8305-5618
Joseph A MarshMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom.

Funding

European Research CouncilEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 101001169Medical Research Council (MRC) Human Genetics Unit MC_UU_00035/9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationA genome-wide variant effect calibration method was recently developed under the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP), following ClinGen recommendations for variant classification. While genome-wide approaches offer clinical utility, emerging evidence highlights the need for gene- and context-specific calibration to improve accuracy. Building on previous work, we have developed an algorithm tailored to converting functional scores from both multiplexed assays of variant effects (MAVEs) and computational variant effect predictors (VEPs) into ACMG/AMP evidence strengths.

resultsOur method is designed to deliver consistent performance across different genes and score distributions, with all variables adaptively determined from the input data, preventing selective adjustments or overfitting that could inflate evidence strengths beyond empirical support. To facilitate adoption, we introduce acmgscaler, a lightweight R package and a plug-and-play Google Colab notebook for the calibration of custom datasets. This algorithmic framework bridges the gap between MAVEs/VEPs and clinically actionable variant classification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package and Colab notebook are available at https://github.com/badonyi/acmgscaler.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenomicsSoftwareAlgorithmsCalibrationHumans

Identifiers

PMID40929116
PMCPMC12496131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.