Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40929106›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The Pandemic Journaling Project: A new dataset of first-person accounts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sarah S Willen, Katherine A Mason, Heather M Wurtz, Sebastian Karcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah S WillenDepartment of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0827-0510
Katherine A MasonDepartment of Anthropology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Heather M WurtzDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Sebastian KarcherDepartment of Political Science, Syracuse University, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8249-7388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid global spread of the COVID-19 pandemic affected different regions, communities, and individuals in vastly different ways that interdisciplinary social scientists are well-positioned to document and investigate. This paper describes an innovative mixed-methods dataset generated by a research study that was designed to chronicle and preserve evidence of the pandemic's divergent effects: the Pandemic Journaling Project (PJP). The dataset was generated by leveraging digital technology to invite ordinary people around the world to document the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their everyday lives over a two-year period (May 2020-May 2022) using text, images, and audio. METHODS AND

findingsPJP's weekly, online, bilingual (English/Spanish) journaling platform was open to anyone with access to a smartphone or computer, including teens aged 15-17 with permission of a parent or guardian. Participants first completed a baseline quantitative survey, after which they were invited to create two journal entries in response to suggested narrative prompts. In each subsequent week, participants received weekly invitations to contribute via their choice of email or SMS (text message). Each invitation included a link to that week's journaling prompts and accompanying survey questions. Participants could join the project at any point between May 2020 and May 2022. PJP employed a cohort design. Regardless of when they joined, all received the narrative prompts and accompanying survey questions in the same order. Participants could stop participating at any point, and they could later restart if they wished. The project welcomed any interested participant and sought to capture as broad a range of perspectives as possible, while also taking measures to include voices that might not otherwise be preserved in the historical record. The project launched in May 2020. In the two years it operated as a weekly journaling platform, PJP generated nearly 27,000 individual journal entries from over 1,800 people in 55 countries around the world. Data from PJP's first phase (PJP-1) are now accessible at the Qualitative Data Repository (QDR) at Syracuse University.

conclusionsThe first phase of the Pandemic Journaling Project has produced an innovative multimedia dataset that can support studies of how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected a wide range of communities across a wide range of outcomes including mental health, reproductive health, vaccine hesitancy, and trust in health professionals, among others. The dataset is available to researchers who follow established data protection protocols and procedures. These data protection measures will be in place for 25 years, through 2049, after which all PJP-1 data will become a fully accessible public archive via QDR.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40929106
PMCPMC12422429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.