ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Bearing Witness: Témoignage as a Tool for Child Advocacy during Armed Conflict.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethics of child suffering imagery in the context of exploding digital technologies.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Correction: Bearing Witness: Témoignage as a Tool for Child Advocacy during Armed Conflict.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children affected by armed conflict suffer devastating physical, emotional, and social harm. War uproots families, forcing many to flee as refugees or internally displaced persons, while others remain trapped in dangerous environments. In these crises, children face disproportionate risks-violence, exploitation, disrupted education, and collapsed healthcare systems. Their unique vulnerabilities require urgent, targeted action to protect their health, rights, and development. Beyond immediate care, the humanitarian principle of témoignage-bearing witness-is essential. Rooted in humanitarian ethics, témoignage means speaking out about injustice, amplifying the voices of those affected, and driving systemic change. It challenges traditional notions of neutrality and calls on humanitarian professionals to ethically advocate for those they serve. Pediatricians and pediatric organizations have a moral duty to ensure that children affected by conflict are seen, heard, and not forgotten. This commentary calls for recognizing children's distinct humanitarian rights and urges global pediatric societies to take action. To guide this effort, the paper introduces a framework of seven pillars of pediatric témoignage: 1. Amplifying children's voices, 2. Advocating for systemic justice, 3. Providing trauma-informed care, 4. Supporting education and psychosocial integration, 5. Advancing training and research, 6. Building professional and community networks, and 7. Creating platforms for policy influence. These pillars offer a shared language and practical strategies for pediatricians to document harm, collaborate with advocacy groups, and speak out in public forums. Through témoignage, pediatricians can help protect children's dignity and rights, ensure their suffering is not normalized, and contribute to a more just and responsive global system for children in conflict.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.