ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2025
Gaps in care across the cancer screening continuum for cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScreening for cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers reduces cancer-specific mortality, but the full benefits of screening are realized only when they are coupled with timely care across the subsequent "screening continuum" steps, including surveillance (results warranting frequent monitoring), diagnostic evaluation (results that require additional testing), and treatment (detected cancers). Our goal was to describe the proportion of individuals receiving timely cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer care at each step in the screening continuum.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the 10 health-care settings that participate in the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process, 2018 to present, consortium and included individuals who were eligible for a step along the cancer screening continuum in 2018. Proportions of individuals who received timely testing were calculated for screening, surveillance, and diagnostic tests for each of the 3 cancers and treatment (colorectal cancer only), and we evaluated the association of these outcomes with patient characteristics using multivariate logistic regression.
resultsThe overall proportions of timely screening, surveillance, and diagnostic testing were 41.8%, 37.3%, and 61.2% for cervical cancer; 82.4%, 45.5%, and 73.5% for colorectal cancer (94.1% for timely treatment); and 73.8%, 80.5%, and 80.7% for lung cancer. Across all 3 cancers, there were differences across the screening continuum by insurance status, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
conclusionsThere are important gaps in care across the screening continuum beyond common metrics for screening uptake. Comparison across organ types may facilitate the identification of interventions and policies that could broadly improve cancer prevention and promote health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.