ArticlePloS one2025
The effect of face masks on confusion of emotional expressions.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the use of personal protective equipment protects healthcare workers against transmissible disease, it also obscures the lower facial regions that are vital for transmitting emotion signals. Previous studies have found that face coverings can impair recognition of emotional expressions, particularly those that rely on signals from the lower regions of the face, such as disgust. Recent research on the individual differences that may influence expression recognition, such as emotional intelligence, has shown mixed results. In the current investigation, we conducted two experiments to build on previous work to further investigate the role of emotional intelligence in emotion recognition. Participants viewed a set of masked and unmasked models displaying six different emotional expressions for a limited time (0.5 s, 1.0 s, or 1.5 s in Experiment 1 and 1.0 s in Experiment 2). Participants then indicated which emotion options they felt each model expressed. Participants' emotional intelligence was measured using the Schutte Self Report Emotional Test. Emotion recognition accuracy was lower for images with masks than images without masks in both experiments. Confusion rates were not uniform: masked disgust and sadness had the greatest increase of confusion from their unmasked conditions, happiness and surprise had the least confusion in all conditions, and both fear and anger had generally low recognition in masked and unmasked conditions. Emotional intelligence only impacted accuracy when view time was particularly restricted and parts of the face were covered. These results replicate the finding that face masks impair the transmission of emotional signals, and the impairments are a function of the occluded facial regions. Emotional intelligence may moderate this effect in dynamic social interactions where emotional expressions are brief and ambiguous.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.