Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40928991›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

Tarlatamab Exposure-Efficacy and Exposure-Safety Relationships to Inform Dose Selection in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Po-Wei Chen, Mukul Minocha, Stephanie Kong, Tony Jiang, Erik S Anderson, Amanda Parkes, Pablo Martinez, Brett E Houk, Chih-Wei Lin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05060016 (A Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Tarlatamab in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer After Two or More Prior Lines of Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05060016 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Tarlatamab in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer After Two or More Prior Lines of Treatment (DeLLphi-301).

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2021 to 2027Enrolled222ConditionsRelapsed/Refractory Small Cell Lung CancerArmsTarlatamab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Envisioning Low-Dose Tarlatamab.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Po-Wei ChenClinical Pharmacology Modeling and Simulation, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.ORCID 0009-0009-5970-2852
Mukul MinochaClinical Pharmacology Modeling and Simulation, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.ORCID 0009-0002-5945-6312
Stephanie KongClinical Pharmacology Modeling and Simulation, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8441-1373
Tony JiangGlobal Biostatistical Science, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.ORCID 0009-0002-8199-1549
Erik S AndersonClinical Development Oncology, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5014-8706
Amanda ParkesClinical Development Oncology, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.ORCID 0000-0002-2599-6460
Pablo MartinezClinical Development Oncology, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.ORCID 0009-0006-9917-0406
Brett E HoukClinical Pharmacology Modeling and Simulation, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1979-917X
Chih-Wei LinClinical Pharmacology Modeling and Simulation, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California.ORCID 0009-0002-3126-3981

Funding

Amgen (Amgen Inc.)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTarlatamab is a first-in-class, half-life extended bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3, currently approved for the treatment of adult patients with small cell lung cancer with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. In this study, we report tarlatamab exposure-response relationships to inform dose selection in patients with small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsPharmacokinetic data were correlated with therapeutic effect (exposure-response analyses) for efficacy and safety measures using pooled data from the DeLLphi-300 and DeLLphi-301 studies. Efficacy measures included objective response rate, disease control rate, best change from baseline in tumor size, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Safety events included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), treatment-related adverse events, and TEAE of interest, including cytokine release syndrome, neutropenia, and neurologic toxicity such as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Effects of patient-specific factors were also assessed. Doses ranging from 0.003 to 100 mg every 2 weeks and 200 mg every 3 weeks were explored.

resultsSignificant positive exposure-response relationships were established for all evaluated efficacy measures. Near-maximal efficacy was reached at exposures associated with the clinical regimen of 10 mg every 2 weeks. No relationships with exposure were identified for the following grade ≥3 events: TEAE, treatment-related adverse events, cytokine release syndrome, and neurologic toxicity, including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. A shallow trend was observed for a higher percentage of patients experiencing grade ≥3 neutropenia with higher exposures.

conclusionsThis analysis supports a 10-mg every-2-weeks regimen and that no dose adjustment is necessary based on age, race, body weight, immunogenicity, number of prior therapies, or disease burden.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaAdultAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40928991
PMCPMC12616239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.