ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2025
Conserved multiepitopes in
Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunodominant B-cell epitopes for precision surveillance ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Population HLA coverage of experimentally characterizedFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A subset of Plasmodium falciparum RIFINs is linked to severe malaria risk reduction and engages LILRB1 through a conserved structural motif.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2025
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is no vaccine for severe malaria. STEVOR antigens on the surface of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.