ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2026
Contrastive Learning Model for Wearable-Based Ataxia Assessment.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFrequent and objective assessment of ataxia severity is essential for tracking disease progression and evaluating the effectiveness of potential treatments. Wearable-based assessments have emerged as a promising solution. However, existing methods rely on inertial data features directly correlated with subjective and coarse clinician-evaluated rating scales, which serve as imperfect gold standards. This approach may introduce biases and restrict flexibility in feature design. To address these limitations, this study introduces a novel contrastive learning-based model that leverages motor severity differences in wearable inertial data to learn relevant features.
methodsThe model was trained on inertial data collected from 87 individuals with diagnostically heterogeneous ataxias and 44 healthy participants performing the finger-to-nose task. A pairwise contrastive loss function was proposed to learn representations capturing relative differences in ataxia severity, which were evaluated through downstream regression and classification tasks.
resultsThe learned features demonstrated strong cross-sectional (r = 0.84) and longitudinal (r = 0.68) associations with clinical scores and robust measurement reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96). Additionally, the model exhibited strong known-group validity, distinguishing between ataxia and healthy phenotypes with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95.
conclusionThe proposed contrastive model captures robust representations of disease severity with reduced reliance on clinical scales, outperforming state-of-the-art methods that derive features directly from clinical scores. SIGNIFICANCE: Combining wearable sensors with contrastive learning enables a more objective, scalable, and frequent method for assessing ataxia severity, with the potential to enhance patient monitoring and improve clinical trial efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.