Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40928880›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Bridging feeling and motion: Insula-premotor dynamics in the processing of action vitality forms.

Giuseppe Di Cesare, Yury Koush, Peter Zeidman, Alessandra Sciutti, Karl Friston, Giacomo Rizzolatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bridging feeling and motion: Insula-premotor dynamics in the processing of action vitality forms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giuseppe Di CesareDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma 43124, Italy.
Yury KoushVladimir Zelman Center for Neurobiology and Brain Rehabilitation, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3684-5641
Peter ZeidmanDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom.
Alessandra SciuttiItalian Institute of Technology, Cognitive Architecture for Collaborative Technologies Unit, Genova 16152, Italy.
Karl FristonItalian Institute of Technology, Cognitive Architecture for Collaborative Technologies Unit, Genova 16152, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7984-8909
Giacomo RizzolattiIstituto di Neuroscienze, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Parma 43125, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9700-5171

Funding

Fondazione Cariplo (Cariplo Foundation) 2023-2315Wellcome Trust (WT) 226793/Z/22/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Typically, people perform actions in a valenced-positive or negative-way, depending on their attitudes or desires. These forms of action are named vitality forms (VFs). While it is well established that action goals are mediated by a parieto-frontal network, less is known about the processing of VFs. Recent fMRI studies suggest that the insula (INS)-and its connections with the parieto-frontal circuit-plays a crucial role in VFs processing. However, a key question remains: How does our internal affective state shape our motor behavior? To explore this issue, we conducted an fMRI study. Participants were required to perform two sequential tasks: 1) to evoke either a positive (enthusiastic) or a negative (angry) affective state (feeling task); 2) to execute an action while maintaining these affective states (execution task). Univariate analysis revealed activation of the INS and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) during the feeling task, which extended to the premotor (PM) and parietal areas during the execution task. To determine the directionality of information flow among these nodes, we employed dynamic causal modeling. Bayesian model comparison showed that, during the feeling task, affect generation involves INS, which, together with the PFC, modulates the activity of PM. In contrast, during execution, motor commands emerge from PM and influence activity in the INS and PFC. These findings indicate that while the internal states crucially imply the INS, their regulation is mediated by PFC. The PM cortex plays a crucial role in the selection of the corresponding action VFs.

Indexed as

EmotionsInsular CortexMotor CortexAdultBayes TheoremBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobePrefrontal CortexYoung Adultaction vitality formsaffective statesdynamic causal modelingfMRIinsula

Identifiers

PMID40928880
PMCPMC12452950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.