Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40928839›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical microbiology2025

Parasitology of the twenty-first century: are we moving in the right direction?

Kinga Kowalewska-Grochowska, Romina Reyes, Pauline Tomlin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kinga Kowalewska-GrochowskaUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Romina ReyesLifeLabs, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Pauline TomlinAlberta Precision Laboratories Public Health Lab, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For thousands of years, parasitic infections have represented a constant challenge to human health. Despite constant progress in science and medicine, the challenge has remained mostly unchanged over the years, partly due to the vast complexity of the host-parasite-environment relationships. Over the last century, our approaches to these challenges have evolved through considerable advances in science and technology, offering new and better solutions. Unfortunately, in the twenty-first century, this diagnostic evolution was suddenly confronted with a dramatic change of biological relationships, never witnessed in history before the uncontrolled expansion of the human population, globalization and hyperconnectivity technology have exerted a massive socioeconomic impact on individuals, communities and the environment, sending a ripple effect throughout the world of parasites. Urbanization, pollution and the unsustainable exploitation of natural resources have caused shifts in biomass and the fragmentation of habitats, leading to the movement of parasites into new hosts and territories. At the same time, changes in human population structure and distributions due to armed conflict and poverty created massive migration of entire nations and communities, resulting in the redistribution of parasitic diseases. To make the situation worse, the population of many receiving countries of North America and Europe is ageing, leading to a critical shortage of a specialized workforce essential to deal with the new diagnostic challenges. Unfortunately, this vicious circle is not yet apparent to all. The highly specialized field of parasitology is at a particular risk for such major crises in the near future. Heightened awareness of such risks is an essential step to start discussions and planning to mitigate these very real health threats.

Indexed as

Parasitic DiseasesParasitologyAnimalsHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansartificial intelligencediagnostic parasitologyglobalization effectspecialized expertiseworkforce projections

Identifiers

PMID40928839
PMCPMC12451759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.