ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2025
Compositionality in the semantic network: a model-driven representational similarity analysis.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Semantic composition allows us to construct complex meanings (e.g., "dog house", "house dog") from simpler constituents ("dog", "house"). Neuroimaging studies have often relied on high-level contrasts (e.g., meaningful > non-meaningful phrases) to identify brain regions sensitive to composition. However, such an approach is less apt at addressing how composition is carried out, namely what functions best characterize constituents integration. Here, we rely on simple computational models to explicitly characterize alternative compositional operations, and use representational similarity analysis to compare models to target regions of interest. We re-analyze fMRI data aggregated from four published studies (N = 85), all employing two-word combinations but differing in task requirements. Confirmatory and exploratory analyses reveal compositional representations in the left inferior frontal gyrus (BA45), even when the task did not require semantic access. These results suggest that BA45 represents combinatorial information automatically across task demands, and further characterize composition as the (symmetric) intersection of constituent features. Additionally, a cluster of compositional representations emerges in the left middle superior temporal sulcus, while semantic, but not compositional, representations are observed in the left angular gyrus. Overall, our work clarifies which brain regions represent semantic information compositionally across contexts and tasks, and qualifies which operations best describe composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.