ReviewCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2025
SPM-30 years and beyond.
Review in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-brain histogram analysis and top 20% gray and white matter ratio of amyloid positron emission tomography: A comparison with the centiloid scale.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Distinct neurologic state in patients with traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic stroke during the stage of acute disorders of consciousness and the correlation with the neurological prognosis: A multi-modal PET/rs-fMRI study.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Thirty years of SPM-BrainMap synergy: making and mining coordinate-based literature.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper marks the 30th anniversary of the Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) software and the journal Cerebral Cortex: two modest milestones that mark the inception of cognitive neuroscience. We take this opportunity to reflect on SPM, a generation after its introduction. Each of the authors of this paper-who represent a small selection of the many contributors to SPM-were asked to consider lessons learned, what has gone well, and where there is room for improvement in future development. We hope that this review of SPM-and its aspirations-will provide some context for current imaging neuroscience and foreground some potential directions for the future of the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.