Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40928744›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2025

What are we missing? What are we assuming? The need to foster feature discovery tools to improve statistical models.

Peter Bandettini

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter BandettiniSection on Functional Imaging Methods & Functional MRI Core Facility, National Institute of Mental Health, 10 Center Drive, Rm 1D80, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9038-4746

Funding

Functional MRI Core FacilityZICMH002884 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BANDETTINI, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$85.5M
Functional MRI Method DevelopmentZIAMH002783 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BANDETTINI, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$38.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002783Intramural NIH HHS ZIC MH002884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) has been profoundly influential to neuroimaging as it has fostered rigorous, statistically grounded structure for model-based inferences that have led to mechanistic insights about the human brain over the past 30 years. The statistical constructs shared with the world through SPM have been instrumental for deriving meaning from neuroimaging data; however, they require simplifying assumptions which can provide results that, while statistically sound, may not accurately reflect the mechanisms of brain function. A platform that fosters the exploration of the rich and varying neuronal and physiologic underpinnings of the measured signals and their associations to behavior and physiologic measures needs a different set of tools. These tools, typically developed outside of platforms, allow rapid, iterative hypotheses testing, and flexibility. Rather than primarily working to build tools that account for and normalize sources of variability, platforms would benefit from building more exploratory tools that enable the community to characterize and understand this non-random variability in the signal as it is likely to be brimming with features that could catalyze new directions, as well as enhance the reach of statistical models.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingModels, StatisticalNeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaginganalysis toolsfeature discoveryfMRIneuroimagingpost processing

Identifiers

PMID40928744
PMCPMC13370242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.