ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Global, regional, and national burden of ovarian cancer, 1990-2021, and projections to 2050: a cross-sectional analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subtype-specific mechanisms of lipid metabolism in gynecological malignancies and novel targeted intervention strategies (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Global, regional, and national burden of ovarian cancer from 1990 to 2021: Analysis of risk factors and prediction of trends in 2050.Medicine · 2026Article
- Exosome-Associated Proteins as Mediators and Biomarkers of Ovarian Cancer Dissemination.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Global burden and projected trends of ovarian cancer in older women: A GBD 2021 analysis.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Oral contraceptives exposure may reduce the risk of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis based on cohort studies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Global Burden of Ovarian Cancer and Causal Risk Factors from 1990 to 2021: An Integrated GBD and Mendelian Randomization Analysis.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Burden and Trends of Six Gynecological Diseases Among Chinese Women Aged 15-49 Years, 1990-2021: Evidence from GBD 2021.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Advances in Phase III Clinical Trials and Future Challenges of Targeted Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- Advances in ovarian cancer: biological insights, therapeutic innovations, and future perspectives.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOvarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecological cancer, with fewer than 50% of patients surviving more than 5 years after diagnosis. This study aimed to analyze the global epidemiological trends of ovarian cancer from 1990 to 2021 and also project its prevalence to 2050, providing insights into these evolving patterns and helping health policymakers use healthcare resources more effectively.
methodsThis study comprehensively analyzes the original data related to ovarian cancer from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 database, employing a variety of methods including descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, age-period-cohort analysis, decomposition analysis, predictive analysis, frontier analysis, and health inequality analysis. The aim is to explore the disease burden of ovarian cancer and its changing trends in detail.
resultsFrom 1990 to 2021, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR), age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), and age-standardized disability-adjusted life year rate (ASDR) for ovarian cancer significantly increased, while the age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR) showed a marked decline. In 2021, the ASIR of ovarian cancer was 6.71 per 100 000 population, the ASPR was 28.08 per 100 000, the ASMR was 4.06 per 100 000, and the ASDR was 115.15 per 100 000. As the Social Development Index (SDI) increased, the disease burden of ovarian cancer exhibited a trend of rising initially followed by a decline. Health inequalities between countries have slowed, but high-SDI countries remain the primary regions with the greatest disease burden. The age-standardized rates (ASRs) of ovarian cancer increased with age, with population growth being a major driver of the rise in ovarian cancer ASRs. Furthermore, the effects of aging and epidemiological changes vary across different regions. Predictive results indicate that from 2022 to 2050, both the ASIR and ASPR for ovarian cancer will continue to rise, while the ASMR and ASDR will initially decrease before increasing again. High body mass index and occupational exposure to asbestos are the primary risk factors contributing to ovarian cancer.
conclusionsAlthough the disease burden of ovarian cancer showed a downward trend from 1990 to 2021, a potential rebound may occur in the future. The disease burden of ovarian cancer exhibits significant heterogeneity across age, time, and geographical regions. Greater attention to these factors is needed moving forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.