Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40928729›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2025

Eco Friendly and Budget Smart: An Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Alternative PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitor Dosing Regimens.

Leo Karlsson, Joseph Ciccolini, Rob Ter Heine, Maddalena Centanni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leo KarlssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0009-4880-6496
Joseph CiccoliniCOMPO, Inserm U1068 Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille & Inria Sophia Antipolis, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1733-3410
Rob Ter HeineDepartment of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2185-8201
Maddalena CentanniDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden. maddalena.centanni@uu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-6594-9813

Funding

Cancerfonden 23 2921 Pj
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are clinically beneficial but associated with high costs that represent a growing challenge for healthcare budgets and may affect affordability, especially in resource-limited settings. Moreover, the healthcare sector is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, and medication-related waste-such as that from vial-based therapies-has been identified as a contributing factor. Alternative dosing strategies could reduce the environmental and financial impact of ICI therapy while maintaining clinical safety and efficacy.

methodsPopulation pharmacokinetic simulations were performed using virtual cohorts representative of the original cancer populations treated with ICIs. The analysis was conducted from a Western European hospital perspective, using Dutch public data to estimate costs (based on volume-dependent pricing) and carbon emissions from drug production, travel, and medical waste.

resultsUnder the US Food and Drug Administration exposure-matching criteria, optimized dosing regimens reduced drug costs by up to €23,311 (- 28%) and carbon emissions by up to 255 kgCO₂e (- 30%) per patient, depending on the drug and dosing strategy. Using a broader therapeutic window approach, cost savings reached up to €40,135 (- 69%) and carbon reductions up to 501 kgCO₂e (- 63%) per patient. Incorporating vial sharing further increased potential cost savings to €5,721 per patient (- 31%). All estimates reflect European pricing and emissions factors, modeled over an 8-month treatment period.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that optimizing dosing strategies can yield meaningful economic and environmental benefits in ICI therapy while maintaining drug exposure within levels defined by US Food and Drug Administration criteria or broader therapeutic windows. A user-friendly application developed in this study allows users to generate virtual populations and evaluate tailored dosing strategies, facilitating practical implementation in diverse healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsBudgetsComputer SimulationCost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsDrug CostsGreenhouse GasesHumansNetherlandsGreenhouse GasesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40928729
PMCPMC12602602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.