ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2025
Distinct codon usage signatures reflecting evolutionary and pathogenic adaptation in the Acinetobacter baumannii complex.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isoelectric point stabilization and protein mass compression are associated with antimicrobial resistance in the genus Acinetobacter.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Evolution and Functional Implications of Codon Usage Bias in Eukaryotes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Review
- Mapping the evolutionary and translational landscape of antibiotic resistance genes in Elizabethkingia anopheles.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigates codon usage and amino acid usage bias in the genus Acinetobacter to uncover the evolutionary forces shaping these patterns and their implications for pathogenicity and biotechnology.
methodsCodon usage patterns were examined in representative genomes of the genus Acinetobacter using standard codon bias indices, including GC content, relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU), effective number of codons (ENC), and codon adaptation index (CAI). Neutrality and parity plots were employed to evaluate the relative influence of mutational pressure and natural selection on codon preferences. Codon pair usage and amino acid composition were assessed to identify functional constraints, while phylogenetic relationships were inferred using gyrB gene sequences to explore evolutionary divergence in the genus Acinetobacter.
resultsA dynamic GC content range was observed, from 35.71% in Acinetobacter equi to 46.21% in Acinetobacter indicus, with the Acinetobacter baumannii complex. maintaining a balanced GC distribution (39%), suggesting genomic stability. AT-rich preferred codons indicated selective pressure favouring specific codons, while correlations with GC composition underscored the role of mutational bias. CAI values >0.5 in highly expressed genes denote bias toward optimal codons. Codon pair usage revealed distinctive patterns, with notable similarities within the Acinetobacter baumannii complex, indicating functional congruence. The gyrB phylogeny clustered Acinetobacter baumannii complex despite evolutionary divergence.
conclusionCodon usage in the genus Acinetobacter reflects a complex interplay of mutational and selective forces, shaping genomic and functional diversity. Distinct disparities in codon usage between pathogenic and non-pathogenic species point to genomic signatures that may underpin virulence, warranting further investigation into their pathogenic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40928726What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.