ArticleMolecular biology reports2025
Environmental antibiotic stress and high-risk resistance genes in bacterial communities of the Gomti and Ganga Rivers, India.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe river ecosystems provide habitats and source of water for a number of species including humans. The uncontrolled accumulation of pollutants in the aquatic environment enhances the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and genes.
methodsWater samples were collected seasonally from different sites of Gomti and Ganga River. Bacteria were isolated by plating on nutrient agar supplemented with individual antibiotics (100 µg/ml) to select the resistant strains. These isolates were subsequently tested for cross-resistance to other antibiotics using the disc diffusion method. PCR was performed to detect selected ARGs.
resultsThe enumeration of microbial population of Gomti River, the tetracycline-resistant bacteria comprised 38% of the bacterial population during spring and chloramphenicol resistance during autumn was a mere 11.9%. Nevertheless, erythromycin resistance was widespread amongst Ganga river bacteria during winter by 28%, while ciprofloxacin resistance was seen in autumn with only 15.8%. Bacterial population led to decline due to antibiotic-induced stress. The tetracycline-resistant bacteria were completely resistant to ampicillin and 66.6% were resistant to erythromycin. In Ganga river water, 53.5% of ampicillin-resistant isolates were resistant to erythromycin and sulphadiazine 93.3% were resistant to nalidixic acid. In the Gomti River water, the most common resistance gene among tetracycline resistant isolates was tetM (83.3%), followed by ampC (83.3%) in ampicillin-resistant isolates. In the Ganga River, 66.6% of bacterial isolates were found to have ampC and ermB genes. The sul1 gene was absent in all the bacterial isolates in both water samples.
conclusionThese findings indicate that both rivers act as reservoirs for multidrug-resistant bacteria harbouring complex resistance gene profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40928717What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.