SynthesisJournal of religion and health2026
Spirituality and Medicine in the USA, Europe, and the UK: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Integrative Approaches to Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life, and Health Outcomes.
Synthesis in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Religious and Spiritual Practices as Complementary Support for Biomedical Care Among Christian and Muslim Filipino Adults.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spiritual interventions, including meditation, prayer, mindfulness, and compassionate care, have gained increasing attention for their potential to enhance both psychological resilience and overall health. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined eight eligible studies conducted across the USA, Europe, and China to assess the impact of such interventions on key outcomes, namely anxiety reduction, quality of life, chronic disease symptom management, and patient satisfaction. Seven studies contributed quantitative data. The pooled results indicated significant improvements in anxiety symptoms (effect size: 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.90), meaningful gains in quality of life (effect size: 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.90), and moderate benefits for chronic disease outcomes (effect size: 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.80). Rates of patient satisfaction with spiritual support consistently exceeded 80%, with the highest ratings reported in palliative care contexts. Subgroup analyses highlighted stronger effects among older adults, individuals living with chronic illness, and participants in meditation-based programs. Minimal publication bias was observed, and sensitivity testing confirmed the robustness of the findings. Collectively, these results emphasize the clinical value of integrating spiritual care into patient-centered health models and underscore the need for broader implementation strategies that promote holistic well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40928619What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.